AB758: Bill Text

Uninsured employers fund

Adequacy of fund balance. Under current law, if an employer is not insured or self-insured as required by the worker's compensation law, the employer is liable to DWD for certain payments that are deposited in an uninsured employers fund. DWD uses the uninsured employers fund to administer the laws relating to uninsured employers and to pay to the injured employees of uninsured employers benefits that are equal to the worker's compensation owed by the uninsured employers. Currently, if the secretary of workforce development determines that expected losses on known claims and on incurred, but not reported, claims, exceed 85 percent of the cash balance in the uninsured employers fund, that secretary must file a certificate with the secretary of administration attesting that the cash balance is likely to be inadequate to fund all claims against the fund and specifying a date after which no new claims will be paid.

This bill eliminates the requirement that the secretary of workforce development consider incurred, but not reported, claims in determining whether expected losses on claims exceed 85 percent of the cash balance in the uninsured employers fund and, therefore, whether that cash balance is likely to be inadequate to fund all claims against that fund. Accordingly, under the bill, the secretary of workforce development is required to consider only expected losses on known claims in determining whether the cash balance in the uninsured employers fund is likely to be inadequate to fund all claims against that fund.

Collection of payments owed. Current law provides two procedures by which DWD may collect payments owed to DWD by an uninsured employer. Under the first procedure, if an uninsured employer fails to pay an amount owed to DWD and no proceeding for review is pending, DWD may issue a warrant to the clerk of circuit court of any county in the state and the clerk of circuit court dockets the warrant, which gives the warrant the effect of a final judgment constituting a perfected lien on the uninsured employer's real and personal property located in the county where the warrant is entered. Currently, a lien created by a judgment is effective for ten years after the date of entry of the judgment. Under the second procedure, if no proceeding for review is pending, DWD may levy on any personal property of the uninsured employer, after demanding payment and giving ten days' notice of its intent to pursue legal action to collect the debt. This bill specifies that a lien for payments owed by an uninsured employer is effective when DWD issues the warrant and provides that the lien continues in effect until the amount owed, including interest, costs, and other fees to the date of payment, is paid.

Under current law, if DWD cannot collect a payment owed from an uninsured employer that is a corporation or limited liability company, then any officer, director, member, or manager of the uninsured employer may be held personally liable for that payment. This bill provides that the personal liability of those individuals is an independent obligation, applies to those individuals the procedures under current law by which DWD may collect payments owed by an uninsured employer, and specifies that a lien on the real and personal property of an individual who is personally liable for an amount owed by an uninsured employer continues in effect until the amount owed, including interest, costs, and other fees to the date of payment, is paid.

Program administration

Necessity of treatment standards. Under current law, DWD is required to promulgate rules establishing standards for determining the necessity of treatment provided to an injured employee, which standards must be applied by experts in rendering opinions as to necessity of treatment and by DWD in determining necessity of treatment when there is a dispute between a health care provider and an insurer or self-insured employer over necessity of treatment. Current law requires those rules, to the greatest extent practicable, to be consistent with certain Minnesota rules, as amended to January 1, 2006. This bill eliminates the requirement that the rules establishing necessity of treatment standards be consistent with those Minnesota rules.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

AB758, s. 1 Section 1. 102.03 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,10,7 102.03 (4) The right to compensation and the amount of the compensation shall in all cases be determined in accordance with the provisions of law in effect as of the date of the injury except as to employees whose rate of compensation is changed as provided in ss. 102.43 (7) and 102.44 (1) and (5) and employees who are eligible to receive private rehabilitative counseling and rehabilitative training under s. 102.61 (1m) and except as provided in s. 102.555 (12) (b).

AB758, s. 2 Section 2. 102.11 (1) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,10,24 102.11 (1) (intro.) The average weekly earnings for temporary disability, permanent total disability, or death benefits for injury in each calendar year on or after January 1, 1982, shall be not less than $30 nor more than the wage rate that results in a maximum compensation rate of 110 percent of the state's average weekly earnings as determined under s. 108.05 as of June 30 of the previous year. The average weekly earnings for permanent partial disability shall be not less than $30 and, for permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after April 1, 2006, and before January 1, 2007, not more than $378, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $252, and, for permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2007, not more than $393, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $262 the effective date of this subsection .... [revisor inserts date], and before January 1, 2009, not more than $408, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $272, and, for permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2009, not more than $423, resulting in a maximum compensation rate of $282. Between such limits the average weekly earnings shall be determined as follows:

AB758, s. 3 Section 3. 102.16 (1m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,11,15 102.16 (1m) (a) If an insurer or self-insured employer concedes by compromise under sub. (1) or stipulation under s. 102.18 (1) (a) that the insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for any health services provided to an injured employee by a health service provider, but disputes the reasonableness of the fee charged by the health service provider, the department may include in its order confirming the compromise or stipulation a determination as to the reasonableness of the fee or the department may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the health service provider under sub. (2) (b) that the reasonableness of the fee is in dispute. The department shall deny payment of a health service fee that the department determines under this paragraph to be unreasonable. A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a fee dispute under this paragraph are bound by the department's determination under this paragraph on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (2) (f) or is set aside on judicial review as provided in sub. (2) (f).

AB758, s. 4 Section 4. 102.16 (1m) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,12,13 102.16 (1m) (b) If an insurer or self-insured employer concedes by compromise under sub. (1) or stipulation under s. 102.18 (1) (a) that the insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for any treatment provided to an injured employee by a health service provider, but disputes the necessity of the treatment, the department may include in its order confirming the compromise or stipulation a determination as to the necessity of the treatment or the department may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the health service provider under sub. (2m) (b) that the necessity of the treatment is in dispute. The department shall apply the Before determining under this paragraph the necessity of treatment provided to an injured employee, the department may, but is not required to, obtain the opinion of an expert selected by the department who is qualified as provided in sub. (2m) (c). The standards promulgated under sub. (2m) (g) shall be applied by an expert and by the department in rendering an opinion as to, and in determining, necessity of treatment under this paragraph. In cases in which no standards promulgated under sub. (2m) (g) apply, the department shall find the facts regarding necessity of treatment. The department shall deny payment for any treatment that the department determines under this paragraph to be unnecessary. A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under this paragraph over the necessity of treatment are bound by the department's determination under this paragraph on the necessity of the disputed treatment, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (2m) (e) or is set aside on judicial review as provided in sub. (2m) (e).

AB758, s. 5 Section 5. 102.16 (1m) (c) of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,13,7 102.16 (1m) (c) If an insurer or self-insured employer concedes by compromise under sub. (1) or stipulation under s. 102.18 (1) (a) that the insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for the cost of a prescription drug dispensed under s. 102.425 (2) for outpatient use by an injured employee, but disputes the reasonableness of the amount charged for the prescription drug, the department may include in its order confirming the compromise or stipulation a determination as to the reasonableness of the prescription drug charge or the department may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the pharmacist or practitioner dispensing the prescription drug under s. 102.425 (4m) (b) that the reasonableness of the prescription drug charge is in dispute. The department shall deny payment of a prescription drug charge that the department determines under this paragraph to be unreasonable. A pharmacist or practitioner and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under this paragraph over the reasonableness of a prescription drug charge are bound by the department's determination under this paragraph on the reasonableness of the disputed prescription drug charge, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under s. 102.425 (4m) (e) or is set aside on judicial review as provided in s. 102.425 (4m) (e).

AB758, s. 6 Section 6. 102.16 (2) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,13,22 102.16 (2) (a) Except as provided in this paragraph, the department has jurisdiction under this subsection, sub. (1m) (a), and s. 102.17 to resolve a dispute between a health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer over the reasonableness of a fee charged by the health service provider for health services provided to an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter. A health service provider may not submit a fee dispute to the department under this subsection before all treatment by the health service provider of the employee's injury has ended if the amount in controversy, whether based on a single charge or a combination of charges for one or more days of service, is less than $25. After all treatment by a health service provider of an employee's injury has ended, the health service provider may submit any fee dispute to the department, regardless of the amount in controversy. The department shall deny payment of a health service fee that the department determines under this subsection, sub. (1m) (a), or s. 102.18 (1) (b) to be unreasonable.

AB758, s. 7 Section 7. 102.16 (2) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,14,11 102.16 (2) (am) A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a fee dispute under this subsection are bound by the department's determination under this subsection on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside on judicial review as provided in par. (f). A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a fee dispute under sub. (1m) (a) are bound by the department's determination under sub. (1m) (a) on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside or modified by the department under sub. (1). An insurer or self-insured employer that is a party to a fee dispute under s. 102.17 and a health service provider are bound by the department's determination under s. 102.18 (1) (b) on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under s. 102.18 (3) or by the commission under s. 102.18 (3) or (4) or is set aside on judicial review under s. 102.23.

AB758, s. 8 Section 8. 102.16 (2m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,15,2 102.16 (2m) (a) Except as provided in this paragraph, the department has jurisdiction under this subsection, sub. (1m) (b), and s. 102.17 to resolve a dispute between a health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer over the necessity of treatment provided for an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter. A health service provider may not submit a dispute over necessity of treatment to the department under this subsection before all treatment by the health service provider of the employee's injury has ended if the amount in controversy, whether based on a single charge or a combination of charges for one or more days of service, is less than $25. After all treatment by a health service provider of an employee's injury has ended, the health service provider may submit any dispute over necessity of treatment to the department, regardless of the amount in controversy. The department shall deny payment for any treatment that the department determines under this subsection, sub. (1m) (b), or s. 102.18 (1) (b) to be unnecessary.

AB758, s. 9 Section 9. 102.16 (2m) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,15,17 102.16 (2m) (am) A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under this subsection over the necessity of treatment are bound by the department's determination under this subsection on the necessity of that the disputed treatment, unless that determination is set aside on judicial review as provided in par. (e). A health service provider and an insurer or self-insured employer that are parties to a dispute under sub. (1m) (b) over the necessity of treatment are bound by the department's determination under sub. (1m) (b) on the necessity of that treatment, unless that determination is set aside or modified by the department under sub. (1). An insurer or self-insured employer that is a party to a dispute under s. 102.17 over the necessity of treatment and a health service provider are bound by the department's determination under s. 102.18 (1) (b) on the necessity of that treatment, unless that determination is set aside, reversed or modified by the department under s. 102.18 (3) or by the commission under s. 102.18 (3) or (4) or is set aside on judicial review under s. 102.23.

AB758, s. 10 Section 10. 102.16 (2m) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,16,13 102.16 (2m) (c) Before determining under this subsection the necessity of treatment provided for an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter, the department shall obtain a written opinion on the necessity of the treatment in dispute from an expert selected by the department. Before determining under sub. (1m) (b) or s. 102.18 (1) (bg) 2. the necessity of treatment provided for an injured employee who claims benefits under this chapter, the department may, but is not required to, obtain such an expert opinion. To qualify as an expert, a person must be licensed to practice the same health care profession as the individual health service provider whose treatment is under review and must either be performing services for an impartial health care services review organization or be a member of an independent panel of experts established by the department under par. (f). The standards promulgated under par. (g) shall be applied by an expert and by the department in rendering an opinion as to necessity of treatment under this paragraph and by the department, and in determining , necessity of treatment under this paragraph. In cases in which no standards promulgated under sub. (2m) (g) apply, the department shall find the facts regarding necessity of treatment. The department shall adopt the written opinion of the expert as the department's determination on the issues covered in the written opinion, unless the health service provider or the insurer or self-insured employer present clear and convincing written evidence that the expert's opinion is in error.

AB758, s. 11 Section 11. 102.16 (2m) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,16,25 102.16 (2m) (g) The department shall promulgate rules establishing procedures and requirements for the necessity of treatment dispute resolution process under this subsection, including rules setting the fees under par. (f) and rules establishing standards for determining the necessity of treatment provided to an injured employee. The rules establishing those standards shall, to the greatest extent possible, be consistent with Minnesota rules 5221.6010 to 5221.8900, as amended to January 1, 2006. Before the department may amend the rules establishing those standards, the department shall establish an advisory committee under s. 227.13 composed of health care providers providing treatment under s. 102.42 to advise the department and the council on worker's compensation on amending those rules.

AB758, s. 12 Section 12. 102.16 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,17,10 102.16 (3) No employer subject to this chapter may solicit, receive, or collect any money from an employee or any other person or make any deduction from their wages, either directly or indirectly, for the purpose of discharging any liability under this chapter or recovering premiums paid on a contract described under s. 102.31 (1) (a) or a policy described under s. 102.315 (3), (4), or (5) (a); nor may any such employer subject to this chapter sell to an employee or other person, or solicit or require the employee or other person to purchase, medical, chiropractic, podiatric, psychological, dental, or hospital tickets or contracts for medical, surgical, hospital, or other health care treatment which that is required to be furnished by that employer.

AB758, s. 13 Section 13. 102.17 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,18,6 102.17 (4) Except as provided in this subsection and s. 102.555 (12) (b), the right of an employee, the employee's legal representative, or a dependent to proceed under this section shall not extend beyond 12 years from after the date of the injury or death or from after the date that compensation, other than treatment or burial expenses, was last paid, or would have been last payable if no advancement were made, whichever date is latest. In the case of occupational disease; a traumatic injury resulting in the loss or total impairment of a hand or any part of the rest of the arm proximal to the hand or of a foot or any part of the rest of the leg proximal to the foot, any loss of vision, or any permanent brain injury; or a traumatic injury causing the need for an artificial spinal disc or a total or partial knee or hip replacement, there shall be no statute of limitations, except that benefits or treatment expense for an occupational disease becoming due after 12 years from after the date of injury or death or last payment of compensation shall be paid from the work injury supplemental benefit fund under s. 102.65 and in the manner provided in s. 102.66 and benefits or treatment expense for a traumatic injury becoming due after 12 years from after that date shall be paid by the employer or insurer. Payment of wages by the employer during disability or absence from work to obtain treatment shall be deemed considered payment of compensation for the purpose of this section if the employer knew of the employee's condition and its alleged relation to the employment.

AB758, s. 14 Section 14. 102.18 (1) (bg) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,18,21 102.18 (1) (bg) 1. If the department finds under par. (b) that an insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for any health services provided to an injured employee by a health service provider, but that the reasonableness of the fee charged by the health service provider is in dispute, the department may include in its order under par. (b) a determination as to the reasonableness of the fee or the department may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the health service provider under s. 102.16 (2) (b) that the reasonableness of the fee is in dispute. The department shall deny payment of a health service fee that the department determines under this subdivision to be unreasonable. An insurer or self-insured employer and a health service provider that are parties to a fee dispute under this subdivision are bound by the department's determination under this subdivision on the reasonableness of the disputed fee, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (3) or by the commission under sub. (3) or (4) or is set aside on judicial review under s. 102.23.

AB758, s. 15 Section 15. 102.18 (1) (bg) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,19,19 102.18 (1) (bg) 2. If the department finds under par. (b) that an employer or insurance carrier is liable under this chapter for any treatment provided to an injured employee by a health service provider, but that the necessity of the treatment is in dispute, the department may include in its order under par. (b) a determination as to the necessity of the treatment or the department may notify, or direct the employer or insurance carrier to notify, the health service provider under s. 102.16 (2m) (b) that the necessity of the treatment is in dispute. The department shall apply the Before determining under this subdivision the necessity of treatment provided to an injured employee, the department may, but is not required to, obtain the opinion of an expert selected by the department who is qualified as provided in s. 102.16 (2m) (c). The standards promulgated under s. 102.16 (2m) (g) shall be applied by an expert in rendering an opinion as to, and in determining , necessity of treatment under this paragraph subdivision. In cases in which no standards promulgated under s. 102.16 (2m) (g) apply, the department shall find the facts regarding necessity of treatment. The department shall deny payment for any treatment that the department determines under this subdivision to be unnecessary. An insurer or self-insured employer and a health service provider that are parties to a dispute under this subdivision over the necessity of treatment are bound by the department's determination under this subdivision on the necessity of the disputed treatment, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (3) or by the commission under sub. (3) or (4) or is set aside on judicial review under s. 102.23.

AB758, s. 16 Section 16. 102.18 (1) (bg) 3. of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,20,12 102.18 (1) (bg) 3. If the department finds under par. (b) that an insurer or self-insured employer is liable under this chapter for the cost of a prescription drug dispensed under s. 102.425 (2) for outpatient use by an injured employee, but that the reasonableness of the amount charged for that prescription drug is in dispute, the department may include in its order under par. (b) a determination as to the reasonableness of the prescription drug charge or the department may notify, or direct the insurer or self-insured employer to notify, the pharmacist or practitioner dispensing the prescription drug under s. 102.425 (4m) (b) that the reasonableness of the prescription drug charge is in dispute. The department shall deny payment of a prescription drug charge that the department determines under this subdivision to be unreasonable. An insurer or self-insured employer and a pharmacist or practitioner that are parties to a dispute under this subdivision over the reasonableness of a prescription drug charge are bound by the department's determination under par. (b) on the reasonableness of the disputed prescription drug charge, unless that determination is set aside, reversed, or modified by the department under sub. (3) or by the commission under sub. (3) or (4) or is set aside on judicial review under s. 102.23.

AB758, s. 17 Section 17. 102.26 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB758,21,2 102.26 (2) Unless previously authorized by the department, no fee may be charged or received for the enforcement or collection of any claim for compensation, nor may any contract therefor for that enforcement or collection be enforceable where such when that fee, inclusive of all taxable attorney fees paid or agreed to be paid for such that enforcement or collection, exceeds 20% 20 percent of the amount at which such that claim is compromised or of the amount awarded, adjudged, or collected, except that in cases of admitted liability where in which there is no dispute as to the amount of compensation due and in which no hearing or appeal is necessary, the fee charged shall may not exceed 10% 10 percent, but not to exceed $100 $250, of the amount at which such that claim is compromised or of the amount awarded, adjudged, or collected. The limitation as to fees shall apply to the combined charges of attorneys, solicitors, representatives, and adjusters who knowingly combine their efforts toward the enforcement or collection of any compensation claim.

AB758, s. 18 Section 18. 102.29 (6) of the statutes is renumbered 102.29 (6) (b) (intro.) and amended to read:

AB758,21,7 102.29 (6) (b) (intro.) No employee of a temporary help agency who makes a claim for compensation may make a claim or maintain an action in tort against any of the following:

AB758,21,9 1. Any employer who that compensates the temporary help agency for the employee's services.

AB758, s. 19 Section 19. 102.29 (6) (a) of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,21,13 102.29 (6) (a) In this subsection, "temporary help agency" means a temporary help agency that is primarily engaged in the business of placing its employees with or leasing its employees to another employer as provided in s. 102.01 (2) (f).

AB758, s. 20 Section 20. 102.29 (6) (b) 2. of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,21,16 102.29 (6) (b) 2. Any other temporary help agency that is compensated by that employer for another employee's services.

AB758, s. 21 Section 21. 102.29 (6) (b) 3. of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,21,22 102.29 (6) (b) 3. Any employee of that compensating employer or of that other temporary help agency, unless the employee who makes a claim for compensation would have a right under s. 102.03 (2) to bring an action against the employee of the compensating employer or the employee of the other temporary help agency if the employees were coemployees.

AB758, s. 22 Section 22. 102.29 (6) (c) of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,22,3 102.29 (6) (c) No employee of an employer that compensates a temporary help agency for another employee's services who makes a claim for compensation may make a claim or maintain an action in tort against any of the following:

AB758,22,4 1. The temporary help agency.

AB758,22,8 2. Any employee of the temporary help agency, unless the employee who makes a claim for compensation would have a right under s. 102.03 (2) to bring an action against the employee of the temporary help agency if the employees were coemployees.

AB758, s. 23 Section 23. 102.29 (6m) of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,22,12 102.29 (6m) (a) No leased employee, as defined in s. 102.315 (1) (g), who makes a claim for compensation may make a claim or maintain an action in tort against any of the following:

AB758,22,14 1. The client, as defined in s. 102.315 (1) (b), that accepted the services of the leased employee.

AB758,22,16 2. Any other employee leasing company, as defined in s. 102.315 (1) (f), that provides the services of another leased employee to the client.

AB758,22,21 3. Any employee of the client or of that other employee leasing company, unless the leased employee who makes a claim for compensation would have a right under s. 102.03 (2) to bring an action against the employee of the client or the leased employee of the other employee leasing company if the employees and leased employees were coemployees.

AB758,22,23 (b) No employee of a client who makes a claim for compensation may make a claim or maintain an action in tort against any of the following:

AB758,22,25 1. An employee leasing company that provides the services of a leased employee to the client.

AB758,23,4 2. Any leased employee of the employee leasing company, unless the employee who makes a claim for compensation would have a right under s. 102.03 (2) to bring an action against the leased employee if the employee and the leased employee were coemployees.

AB758, s. 24 Section 24. 102.31 (2m) of the statutes is repealed.

AB758, s. 25 Section 25. 102.315 of the statutes is created to read:

AB758,23,8 102.315 Worker's compensation insurance; employee leasing companies. (1) Definitions. In this section:

AB758,23,10 (a) "Bureau" means the Wisconsin compensation rating bureau under s. 626.06.

AB758,23,13 (b) "Client" means a person that obtains all or part of its nontemporary, ongoing employee workforce through an employee leasing agreement with an employee leasing company.

AB758,23,16 (c) "Divided workforce" means a workforce in which some of the employees of a client are leased employees and some of the employees of the client are not leased employees.

AB758,23,20 (d) "Divided workforce plan" means a plan under which 2 worker's compensation insurance policies are issued to cover the employees of a client that has a divided workforce, one policy covering the leased employees of the client and one policy covering the employees of the client who are not leased employees.

AB758,23,23 (e) "Employee leasing agreement" means a written contract between an employee leasing company and a client under which the employee leasing company provides all or part of the nontemporary, ongoing employee workforce of the client.

AB758,24,7 (f) "Employee leasing company" means a person that contracts to provide the nontemporary, ongoing employee workforce of a client under a written agreement, regardless of whether the person uses the term "professional employer organization," "PEO," "staff leasing company," "registered staff leasing company," or "employee leasing company," or uses any other, similar name, as part of the person's business name or to describe the person's business. "Employee leasing company" does not include a cooperative educational service agency. This definition applies only for the purposes of this chapter and does not apply to the use of the term in any other chapter.

AB758,24,9 (g) "Leased employee" means a nontemporary, ongoing employee whose services are obtained by a client under an employee leasing agreement.

AB758,24,13 (h) "Master policy" means a single worker's compensation insurance policy issued by an insurer authorized to do business in this state to an employee leasing company in the name of the employee leasing company that covers more than one client of the employee leasing company.

AB758,24,17 (i) "Multiple coordinated policy" means a contract of insurance for worker's compensation under which an insurer authorized to do business in this state issues separate worker's compensation insurance policies to an employee leasing company for each client of the employee leasing company that is insured under the contract.

AB758,24,23 (j) "Small client" means a client that has an unmodified annual premium assignable to its business, including the business of all entities or organizations that are under common control or ownership with the client, that is equal to or less than the threshold below which employers are not experience rated under the standards and criteria under ss. 626.11 and 626.12, without regard to whether the client has a divided workforce.

AB758,25,6 (2) Employee leasing company liable. An employee leasing company is liable under s. 102.03 for all compensation payable under this chapter to a leased employee, including any payments required under s. 102.16 (3), 102.18 (1) (b) or (bp), 102.22 (1), 102.35 (3), 102.57, or 102.60. Except as permitted under s. 102.29, an employee leasing company may not seek or receive reimbursement from another employer for any payments made as a result of that liability. An employee leasing company is not liable under s. 102.03 for any compensation payable under this chapter to an employee of a client who is not a leased employee.

AB758,25,17 (3) Multiple coordinated policy required. Except as provided in subs. (4) and (5) (a), an employee leasing company shall insure its liability under sub. (2) by obtaining a separate worker's compensation insurance policy for each client of the employee leasing company under a multiple coordinated policy. The policy shall name both the employee leasing company and the client as named insureds, shall indicate which named insured is the employee leasing company and which is the client, shall designate either the employee leasing company or the client, but not both, as the first named insured, and shall provide the mailing address of each named insured. Except as permitted under sub. (6), an insurer may issue a policy for a client under this subsection only if all of the employees of the client are leased employees and are covered under the policy.

AB758,26,9 (4) Master policy; approval required. An employee leasing company may insure its liability under sub. (2) by obtaining a master policy that has been approved by the commissioner of insurance as provided in this subsection. The commissioner of insurance may approve the issuance of a master policy if the insurer proposing to issue the master policy submits a filing to the bureau showing that the insurer has the technological capacity and operation capability to provide to the bureau information, including unit statistical data, information concerning proof of coverage and cancellation, termination, and nonrenewal of coverage, and any other information that the bureau may require, at the client level and in a format required by the bureau and the bureau submits the filing to the commissioner of insurance for approval under s. 626.13. A master policy filing under this subsection shall also establish basic manual rules governing the issuance of an insurance policy covering the leased employees of a divided workforce that are consistent with sub. (6) and the cancellation, termination, and nonrenewal of policies that are consistent with sub. (10). On approval by the commissioner of insurance of a master policy filing, an insurer may issue a master policy to an employee leasing company insuring the liability of the employee leasing company under sub. (2).

AB758,26,21 (5) Master policy; small clients. (a) Regardless of whether a master policy has been approved under sub. (4), an employee leasing company may insure its liability under sub. (2) with respect to a group of small clients of the employee leasing company by obtaining a master policy in the voluntary market insuring that liability. The fact that an employee leasing company has a client that is covered under a mandatory risk-sharing plan under s. 619.01 does not preclude the employee leasing company from obtaining a master policy under this paragraph so long as that client is not covered under the master policy. An insurer may issue a master policy under this paragraph insuring in the voluntary market the liability under sub. (2) of an employee leasing company with respect to a group of small clients of the employee leasing company regardless of whether any of those small clients has a divided workforce.

AB758,26,24 (b) Within 30 days after the effective date of an employee leasing agreement with a small client that is covered under a master policy under par. (a), the employee leasing company shall report to the department all of the following information:

AB758,27,2 1. The name and address of the small client and of each entity or organization that is under common control or ownership with the small client.

AB758,27,3 2. The number of employees initially covered under the master policy.

AB758,27,8 3. The estimated unmodified annual premium assignable to the small client's business, including the business of all entities or organizations that are under common control or ownership with the small client, without regard to whether the small client has a divided workforce, which information the small client shall report to the employee leasing company.

AB758,27,9 4. The effective date of the employee leasing agreement.

AB758,27,17 (c) Within 30 days after the effective date of coverage of a small client under a master policy under par. (a), the insurer or, if authorized by the insurer, the employee leasing company shall file proof of that coverage with the department. Coverage of a small client under a master policy becomes binding when the insurer or employee leasing company files proof of that coverage under this paragraph or provides notice of coverage to the small client, whichever occurs first. Nothing in this paragraph requires an employee leasing company or an employee of an employee leasing company to be licensed as an insurance intermediary under ch. 628.